You need a javascript enabled browser to watch videos.

　　Click To Unmute

　　Madden NFL 15 Review

　　GameSpot's Top 10 Games of 2023

　　Thompson: The Pop Culture Icon’s Strange Legacy - LoadoutFirearms Expert’s FAVORITE Weapons Of 2023State Of Gaming Handhelds In 2023How Lies of P Cracked the Souls GenreLike a Dragon: Infinite Wealth - Official Ichiban Kasuga Character Spotlight TrailerLike a Dragon: Infinite Wealth - Official Saeko Mukoda Character Spotlight TrailerLike a Dragon: Infinite Wealth - Official Chitose Fujinomiya Character Spotlight TrailerLike a Dragon: Infinite Wealth - Official Eric Tomizawa Character Spotlight TrailerLike a Dragon: Infinite Wealth - Official Kazuma Kiryu Character Spotlight TrailerLike a Dragon: Infinite Wealth - Official Koichi Adachi Character Spotlight TrailerLike a Dragon: Infinite Wealth - Official Yu Nanba Character Spotlight Trailer

　　Share

　　LinkEmbed

　　Size:640 × 360480 × 270

　　Start at: End at: Autoplay Loop

　　Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?

　　Sign up or Sign in now!

　　Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.

　　This video has an invalid file format.

　　00:00:00

　　HTML5

　　Auto HD High Low

　　Report a problem

　　Sorry, but you can't access this content!

Please enter your date of birth to view this video

　　By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's

　　Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

　　enter

　　A federal appeals court judge ruled this week that a lawsuit from a group of retired NFL players over EA's juggernaut Madden football series can move forward. EA sought to have the case, which has to do with the depiction of former players in the series, tossed out, but the judge rejected this.

　　From The Associated Press: "The 9th Circuit said EA was not likely to prevail on its argument that its use of the former players' likenesses was incidental and therefore protected by the First Amendment."

　　Judge Raymond Fisher explained his decision thusly: "We hold EA's use of the former players' likenesses is not incidental because it is central to EA's main commercial purpose--to create a realistic virtual simulation of football games involving current and former NFL teams."

　　One of the players involved in the lawsuit, former Los Angeles Rams quarterback Vince Ferragamo, claimed that the Madden NFL series featured the exact likenesses, including characteristics, of retired players. However, Ferragamo claims EA did not obtain permission for their use.

　　EA said it was disappointed by the court's ruling, explaining that it plans to fight the suit.

　　"We believe in the First Amendment right to create expressive works--in any form--that relate to real-life people and events, and will seek further court review to protect it," EA said.

　　This case is similar to one from 2013, when a court ruled against EA in a suit brought forward by former Arizona State University QB Sam Keller concerning the NCAA Football series. He claimed that EA used college athletes' likenesses without compensating the players. EA ended up paying out $40 million to settle the case, and the NCAA Football series was put on hold.

　　As part of this week's Madden NFL ruling, Judge Fisher said: "Like NCAA Football, Madden NFL replicates players' physical characteristics and allows users to manipulate them in the performance of the same activity for which they are known in real life--playing football for an NFL team."